Mark 8:19-20, "When I brake
the five loaves among five thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye
up? They say unto him, Twelve. And when the seven among four thousand, how many
baskets full of fragments took ye up? And they said, Seven."
This morning, we find ourselves, once again, in the midst of comparison games in
our society. Even though the Scriptures affirm that this method of analysis and
scrutiny for our conduct is not wise (II Corinthians 10:12), we, as fallen
creatures, engage in this "favourite pastime" quite often. When playing games of
comparison with one another or to one another, we are always guaranteed to find
two things: 1. we will find someone doing better than we are, and 2. we will
find someone doing worse than we are. Since we are comparing ourselves to
others, discovery #1 will lead to covetousness at not having what others have or
doing as well as others are doing. Discovery #2 will give sufficient grounds in
our own mind to self justify, "Well, I am not doing so badly after all."
However, while comparisons sometimes are made for a worthy reason, they many
times fail to see the overall conclusion of the matter. This is probably no more
apparent among us as God's people than in trying to measure, gauge, and compare
the Spirit and its manifestations.
While Christ is specifically speaking here in context about being ware of the
leaven of the Pharisees, He brings back to their mind two specific times that
they had with Him. These two experiences are the feeding of the 5,000 and the
4,000 (besides women and children on both occasions). His contextual point is
that their fear about not taking bread for their journey is unfounded. Christ
would not upbraid them for that as He can create something out of nothing or
bless something to multiply the more He divides it (like He did on the two
occasions mentioned). But, let us look at these two occasions and see how they
quell our foolish comparisons about similar situations today.
This natural feeding that Christ accomplished on these two occasions is a mirror
or picture of the spiritual feedings that we have in God's house today. When He
started, there was less food than when He finished. In the interim, He fed a
multitude. In the natural world, there is no corollary to this. Division does
not yield the results of multiplication, but Christ twice accomplished this feat
manifestly. In God's house today, we leave with more than we brought, and we are
filled in the interim. These multitudes arrived hungry, were completely filled,
and the fragments were still enough to feed some more people. Our churches
arrive with hungry saints, leave filled up and running over, and have leavings
to sustain and chew on during the coming week.
Notice also in these accounts that Christ chose to use existing material and
enlarge it for this occasion. He could have just as easily spoken enough food
into existence (out of nothing) to feed these folks and abundantly more. Yet, He
used bread and fishes that were brought by a little lad to accomplish this great
miracle. He today still uses bread and fishes brought by little lads (preachers)
to "grow and enlarge" to accomplish the great miracle of preaching to feed the
hungry sheep. So, now that we have established the correlation between the
natural and spiritual scenarios, let us look at common comparisons today to see
how they stack up in light of the verses above.
Naturally speaking, there were more people - 5,000 compared to 4,000 - fed in
the first instance from less food - five loaves and two small fishes compared to
seven loaves and a few little fishes. Furthermore, there was more left over in
the first instance than the second - twelve baskets full compared to seven.
Looking with man's eyesight at these two events, we would say, "More people fed
from less with more left over. Must have been a greater miracle, better miracle,
etc, etc." While that may sound strange, we today compare preachers, meetings,
etc by some of these same factors.
How many people came? How many preachers were there? Were the preachers
"lively?" Were the congregations "lively?" Did anyone shout? Did anyone join?
Did anyone cry, laugh, clap their hands, etc? These are not improper questions
to ask, but if we are asking them to gauge how "well" the meeting went, then we
are using an un-Biblical measuring stick. I have been to meetings that had large
numbers, small numbers, many preachers, few preachers, manifestly bubbly saints,
more reserved saints, shouting, no shouting, joining, no joining, etc. Yet, the
fact that some of these things happened or did not happen did not measure the
moving effect of the Spirit.
The Spirit may move different services in different ways. I get asked whether we
should shout, not shout, say "amen," not say "amen," etc. The simple answer is
to not quench the Spirit if we feel it move us in a certain way (I Thessalonians
5:19) nor should we force something that makes the service indecent or
disorderly. (I Corinthians 14:40) We should not drag the service out waiting for
someone to join the church, nor should we fail to pray that the Lord continue to
add to His church and burden the hearts of the hearers to take up their cross
and follow the Lamb. So, if none of these comparison factors can be used to
measure the "success" of a meeting or even a single minister's efforts, what is
our Biblical stick to use? I believe the answer is found above.
Whether many loaves or few loaves, slightly larger crowd or not, or more left
over or not, two things are consistent during both miracles. Those two
consistent things are: 1. the people were filled, 2. there was still more left.
Sometimes we set standards for a preaching effort that are unfounded. Perhaps
the minister is moved to tears one day, and we expect that every day thereafter.
Perhaps he is moved in an animated way one day, and we expect that same level of
animation (or moreso) with each succeeding effort. While having those animated,
highly emotional times can be very special and precious, we should not ever be
so bold as to declare them as signs of the Spirit's presence (or signs of His
absence). A sign of the Spirit's presence is the sheep being filled. Do we leave
church filled with the goodness, richness, and majesty of the Lord? Do we leave
with the joy of having the sustenance and strength to serve Him better and with
renewed vigor? There is a good indication of the Spirit's presence among us.
Is there seemingly more to discover than when we arrived? Do we leave with
itches and desires to be scratched and fulfilled in study during the week? Do we
say, "I want to look at that this week?" Again, those are good indications that
the Spirit's presence was among us. Sure, we could say, "But there seemed to be
more baskets last Sunday than this Sunday." Yet, that comparison fails to
acknowledge the more important point that we have more than we came with. Having
more than we came with can only be attributed to the power of God and the
revelation of the righteousness of God. (Romans 1:16-17) Sure, we could say,
"There were more people here last time than this time." Again, that comparison
fails to acknowledge that whether many or few, they were all filled.
It is natural to make comparisons, and it is not always wrong to do so. Yet, too
many times, our comparisons take our eyes off the ultimate and glorious
conclusion of God's miracle and focus them on something secondary and inferior.
While I am thankful for large congregations (when blessed to be a part of one),
supremely thankful to see little lambs come home to His church, lifted up
emotionally when the Spirit charges a congregation that way, and encouraged when
hearing shouting (although never impressed to myself), I am more thankful to
hear the voice of my Beloved as He comes skipping along the hills and mountains.
He says to, "Rise up and come away." He prepares a table with the love banner
over me, and that sight can only exist by His Spirit. (Song of Solomon 2) May
those flashes of His glory, treasures from His majesty, and drippings from His
table be that by which we measure that glorious miracle that occurs when He
tabernacles with us.
In Hope,
Bro Philip |