John 11:43-44,
"And when he thus had spoken, he
cried with a loud voice,
Lazarus, come forth. And he
that was dead came forth, bound
hand and foot with
graveclothes: and his face was
bound about with a
napkin. Jesus saith unto them,
Loose him, and let him
go."
This morning, there are many
that get confused
between the effectual call of
the Lord and the utility
of the gospel. Some want to make
them one and the
same act, others want to
intertwine the two, so that
one cannot tell where one ends
and another begins.
The effectual call of the Lord
and the utility of the
gospel are completely separate
acts, and I believe
that these verses bear that out
as well as the
function, purpose, and
characteristics of both.
Notice the first statement of
Christ. It is a
statement given by God to a dead
man. That is the
case with the Lord's effectual
call in EVERY case.
Both the effectual call in
regeneration and the one in
glorification (resurrection) are
given to those things
that are dead. This is an act
that is completely
passive by man. Lazarus had not
the ability to
resist, reject, or accept (of
himself) the command of
the Lord. He came forth because
the power of the Lord
gave Him life and drew Him
forth. Lazarus did not even
come out of the grave under his
own steam, for we read
that he was bound
(unable to move).
If anyone doubts
the binding of dead Jews, just
read the lengthy
details of their burying
process, and one will easily
find that Lazarus could not walk
out after having life.
Therefore, the power of the Lord
must have brought
Him out of the grave as well.
This call only gave
Lazarus natural life again, but
it is a clear picture
of what happens in the effectual
call spiritually to
every child of
grace (much more could be said).
The
next statement of the Lord deals
with the utility of
the gospel. The gospel is a
loosing of the
graveclothes that bind God's
children. Could the Lord
have loosed the clothes when He
called Lazarus out?
Most certainly! Could the Lord
automatically give
every child of grace complete
knowledge in truth upon
regeneration? Most certainly
again! Yet, it pleased
Him in both cases NOT to do so.
It pleased Him to
have those that stood by to
loose Lazarus from his
clothes. It pleased the Lord to
use earthly men to
preach the
unsearchable riches of Christ.
Are
ministers perfect? No in no
wise, as I am sure those
that loosed Lazarus were not
perfect either. Yet, in
both cases the Lord used men on
the scene to open the
eyes and release the burden.
And, when the Lord
reveals Himself to those that
are blind, and they are
made to hear the gospel and know
that their burden
upon them (that binds them) has
been removed, then
they can look
upon their Saviour!
Notice Lazarus
heard the voice of the Lord, but
He could not see Him
until the napkin around his face
was removed.
Likewise, God's children have
heard and felt Him (He
is not far from every one of us,
and we feel after
Him). But, they do not really
begin to see Him (through the eye of faith) until the pages of the
Scriptures begin to be opened
through the gospel. The
gospel does not bring life, but
it shows the one who
has life how they got it and
where to set their
affection upon. Notice that
Lazarus was not set free
to thank those that unloosed the
burden. He was set
free to thank Him who gave Him
life. Likewise,
preachers get ZERO credit, and
the Lord gets ALL the
credit for any
revealing or life.
In Hope,
Bro Philip
|