II Thessalonians 2:8-14, "And
then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with spirit of
his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose
coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they
received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause
God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they
all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in
unrighteousness. But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren
beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation
through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth: Whereunto he
called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus
Christ."
This morning, there are certain passages of Scripture that are harder for us to
deal with than others. They are not difficult in that they seem to oppose the
fundamentals of our doctrine, faith, and order, but they are difficult in that
we many times stumble around trying to find out exactly what the writer intended
when he wrote them. This chapter for me is one that I have changed my thoughts
about the overall sense about half a dozen times, and reserve the right to do so
about half a dozen more. However, one of the things about this chapter that I
find intriguing is that it becomes the source material for a popular discussion
that we participate in many times: is this talking about disobedient children of
God or goats? Perhaps even: is this a timely or eternal context? Many times, we
hedge our focus of a passage into one of these two pigeonholes without realizing
the other pastures of focus that we can consider. On a different note, I have
become increasingly aware that most of the discussions of contexts regarding who
is and who is not a child of God many times miss some of the rich nuggets of
Scriptural truths contained in them. Truly, certain passages are unmistakable,
such as Paul's discussion of Jacob and Esau in Romans 9, but many of the
contexts that we discuss in such a way are really not intended for that lens of
focus, in my opinion.
So, having said all of that, let us examine these verses in an overall sense to
try to discover what exactly Paul is driving at for the Thessalonian church. In
the past, I have studied this context through the glass of, "Are they or are
they not? Is the judgment timely or eternal?" Now, I believe that Paul's thought
in the overall sense differs somewhat from the way that I had previously studied
it. There are passages in the Bible where very strong and harsh language is used
to describe someone that is completely outside the love of God and His divine
grace. Such a case would be the general context of II Peter 2 or the middle
portion of the book of Jude. In fact, Jude uses the harshest language that I
know of in Holy Writ when he describes people "plucked up by the roots twice
dead"! Yet again, certain passages like II Peter 2 do show a contradistinction
between the teachers and the taught. In every case, the harshest language is
reserved for
the teachers of these wicked things, while harsh (but not as harsh) language is
reserved for the taught.
However, passages like the one above show a different type of distinction. Peter
distinguishes between the teachers and the taught. Paul, in our context,
distinguishes between those within the walls of Zion and those without. No
longer do I believe that the two groups in this verse thread show a distinction
between grace children and wrath goats. Rather, Paul is showing the awesome
difference of being within the city or being without. Notice the opening
language in verse 13 that so often goes unnoticed in the discussion of that
grand verse. "We are bound to give thanks to God alway for you brethren." Who is
that? In the first chapter, Paul uses language in verses 1-4 to show that the
brethren he has under consideration are the brethren of the Thessalonian church,
those whose faith groweth exceedingly, whose charity aboundeth, with patience
and faith in the face of persecution in all the churches of God. These brethren
that Paul addresses are
not just children of God, but those that have laboured patiently under
persecution with increasing faith and abounding charity to the glory of God.
Do all of God's children inhabit such a blessed place here in this life? Do all
walk about Zion, telling the towers and marking well her bulwarks? Should that
be the case, then what God declares as an innumerable host in heaven gets
reduced to a very few, indeed the smallest percentage of any group that has ever
lived. Our Lord will not have a sparsely populated heaven, but those that live
in this blessed condition of brethren are few in number. Those that followed
after Christ began to dwindle as His ministry progressed rather than increase.
Even after the magnanimous event of His resurrection and ascension, there were
only 120 faithful followers until the day of Pentecost. Even after Pentecost,
there were few Christians compared to the vast multitudes of heathens and
Mosaical Jews.
Paul is labouring to show that within the walls of Zion, we are spared from many
evils, deceits, delusions, and judgments. That does not mean that Zion is spared
from all the natural judgments that come, but her inhabitants are delivered from
the condemnation of following after a lie, not loving the truth, and thereby not
being delivered (saved) from them. However, not all that are without have the
ability to receive the love of the truth, or believe anything other than a lie.
Some of those without are indeed the vile goats that will one day eternally burn
in the lake of fire or second death. However, Paul is trying to show the
difference between the privileges of Zion and the dangers looming without. Child
of God or not, the dangers without are tremendous. Cares, torments, trials, and
afflictions unceasing and without respite are the world's offering. The respite
from these things, and the relief and comfort for our souls can only be found
within.
The prodigal son knew what it was like to be without after finishing his
journey, and his father's house was far better in the comfort to his soul than
all the riches in the world. Moses esteemed the afflictions of the people of God
better than the riches in Egypt. The reason that esteem of afflictions abounded
more was the knowledge (by faith) that God grants the faithful moments of quiet
peace beside still waters, in green pastures, with communication and fellowship
of serenity with His still, small voice. Those moments are not found in the
noisy bustle and care of the world. They are found in sweet fellowship with God,
most especially in God's house.
Therefore, whether one without is a damned goat or a wayward sheep, the
situation without is the same in the sense that neither have the privilege of
hearing the blessed gospel and sitting down in the goodness of God. True, one
has not the ability and one does, but they still occupy the same place without.
Consider the difference between the strait gate and broad way in Matthew 7.
Surely all would attest that those in the strait gate are God's redeemed elect,
but what about those on the broad way that leadeth to destruction? That broad
way finds goats and sheep alike. Sheep, like the prodigal son, are found at
times and seasons in that course. I, unfortunately, have been on it time and
again. Yet, wayward sheep are not the only travellers. Goats are there as well.
Yet, whether sheep or goats, both are currently on that path in this life in
their actions and conduct. Jacob and Esau were different (one loved and one
hated), yet Jacob found
himself on that broad path during many times in his life. Truly, he is loved and
prized of the Lord, but his actions led to much heartache in his life.
So, what are we to draw from this passage? Paul shows that those without are
deceived, walking in unrighteousness, and showing not a love of the truth.
Should that be cause for us to say they are all damned to an eternal hell?
Rather, it should be cause for us to give thanks that God has shown unto us the
beauty of His house. Paul thanked God for the brethren there, all those that had
obtained like precious faith, and were steadfastly contending for the faith once
delivered to the saints. The reason Paul thanked God so was that he knew and was
assured of their standing with God. We cannot show conclusively the state or
non-state of grace in those without. God is the judge, but the occupation within
Zion shows forth the richest abundance of charity my eyes have ever beheld.
People that may not have previously known each other already love one another.
Those separated by miles and geography are united by the bond of peace and
harmony within the
Lord's church.
Paul thanked God, for he had the evidence that God loved them, saved them,
sanctified them, and they believed the truth. The gospel of truth was preached
to them, and they loved and received it. Do all God's children love and receive
it? Christ turned away thousands of "disciples" in John 6 by His preaching. Does
that mean they were goats? No, for the word calls them disciples. Yet, they did
not believe what Christ preached. These within Zion love what Christ preached,
the apostles preached, and the same things that men continue to preach. This
keeps us from suffering like those without. Our life does not have to be found
in the pigpens of life with husks of corn, but we find the rich, bountiful table
of the Lord's fat things with the love banner over us.
May we never get so caught up in the discussion of sheep vs goats in a passage
as to miss the rich thought of the privileged position of Zion. This position is
something we should never take lightly or for granted, for the light of our
understanding can be removed to leave us in the same darkness as those without
currently find. Our candlestick can be removed by God for leaving our first
love. Yet, our prayers should be those of thanksgiving for those within the
walls that love the truth, and our prayers should also show what Paul did in
another place (Romans 10:1) that those of God's children without would love it
as well. Notice how Paul began the first epistle to these brethren. In I
Thessalonians 1:4, he said he knew something. He knew they were the elect of
God. How could Paul be so bold? He had seen enough of their conduct to him, one
another, and reception of the gospel that he was convinced of their state. He
did not dwell much about
the state of grace of those without, but rather just lumped them as "without."
Today, I try not to spend much time wondering whether those that I meet are
sheep or goats (although I still do fail in that), but one thing I am assured of
is that the greatest people I have ever known are within the walls of Zion.
Further, I am persuaded, as Paul was, of their election by God, sanctification
of Spirit, and see their love and belief of the truth in adherence to His
blessed gospel.
In Hope,
Bro Philip |