Closing Arguments - Yates then Potter
CLOSING WORDS BY MR. YATES.
I want to say to the people, with Brother Potter, I am thankful from my heart
that you have shown so much respect; that you have come out so kindly and
listened so earnestly during these six days that have gone by. It has been no
little thing for you to leave your homes and come here and spend four hours a
day listening to us as we have gone over this large field of discussion. I want
to say, further, that while the war has been pretty warm, and my worthy opponent
and I have almost had a hand-to-hand combat, figuratively speaking, that I do
not hold the remotest feeling of indifference or prejudice toward the brethren
that have been opposed to me. I have been speaking, if I know myself, for the
honor of God and the advancement of his cause. I also return my thanks to the
moderators for their kindness and courtesy during this discussion, and I highly
appreciate the kindness and courtesy my opponent has extended to me. Now, in
conclusion, I will say this: I hope, my dear friends, that in the hands of God
this discussion will prove a blessing to
all of us in this community, and to the cause of Christ in general. I simply ask
you, as one who loves the Master, to investigate this subject; read for
yourselves. Truth need not fear investigation, its foundation is permanent and
unalterable. I leave it with you; think about it; weigh it. And I pray God that
when we are gathered together up in that grand company upon the sunlit mountain
of God, where clouds never come, when they come up from the east and from the
west, and from the north and from the south, each one of us may hear it said,
"Well done, thou good and faithful servant: . . . enter thou into the joy of thy
Lord."
EXPLANATORY NOTE.
According to item seven in the regulations set forth in the Preface, the
speeches of the debaters in this joint discussion, as furnished by the
stenographer, were revised, examined, and approved. After the speeches were
printed, they were submitted to each debater, previous to the binding of the
volume, that he might note "errata." It was also understood that if any verbal
revision which had been made by either debater was objected to by the other, the
same should be fully set forth in an appendix, and in connection therewith
should appear the exact corresponding language of the stenographic reporter. The
foregoing errata constitute all that has been furnished by the debaters for
publication under this agreement. With these exceptions, therefore, the reader
will accept the foregoing pages as a correct exhibit of the arguments presented
on either side during the joint discussion, no formal certificate of correctness
being deemed necessary.