The thirteenth century is commenced with the thirteenth and last Centuria, with
which the Magdeburg Centuriators have concluded their Ecclesiastical
History; which is, as it were, a mournful farewell air, on account of
the lamentable desolation caused by the Pope of Rome, in the worship of
God. Several Roman superstitions mentioned, which were commanded as
solemnly as the Word of God, and are called the baptism of necessity,
the baptism by women, heretics, etc.; etc.; also, how to baptize a child
that is in danger of death.
Some strange passages from Thomas Aquinas, touching infant baptism;
added decree of the bishops of Nemansa, as to how to deal with a child,
concerning which there may be doubt of its having been baptized aright;
also the formula of words to be used by the Driest over the child.
Explanation hat all this was done to gain respect for infant baptism,
among the common people.
Of the true baptism, and how God, in the midst of these storms,
preserved His church.
The followers of the doctrine of Peter Bruis and Henry of Toulouse, who,
in many respects, concurred in the belief of the Anabaptists of the
present day, increase to such an extent, A. D. 1206, that
in the provinces of Languedoc, Narbonne, Gascony, but few people were
found who did not adhere to their doctrine; also the three articles of
their doctrine against the Roman church.
The ancient Waldenses again appear, A. D. 1218, and,
though excommunicated by the pope in the bull of the Lord's Supper,
declare. against the swearing of oaths, taking the life of evil-doers,
the faith of the Roman church, ungodly priests, the pope.
Circumstantial account, that these people, A. D. 1230, were
so numerous, that one traveling from his country to Milan, could lodge
every night with one of his persuasion.
The increase of the Waldenses in France and Flanders, is again stated
for, A. D. 1238.
Statement, for 1242, that
they not only confessed their belief with the mouth, but also suffered
for:t.
Thirty-eight years after, namely, A. D. 1280, it
is shown, that their doctrine had penetrated not only into Lombardy, but
even into Sicily; several articles of their doctrine described in full.
Their increase in various countries of Christendom is again shown, for
the year 1284, as
a proof that notwithstanding the persecutions raised against them, they
did not diminish.
A certain doctrine of Alexander, namely, that baptism must be
administered on confession of faith; whereupon the Waldenses and
Albigenses are introduced once more, for the last time, and it is stated
that they considered infant baptism of no virtue.
Conclusion, being Jacob Mehrning's reply to Mellinus, respecting
baptism.]
This is the century, writes Jacob Mehrning, with which the Magdeburg
Centuriators have closed their church history, etc. Concerning this time
they write in the preface as follows, "This is the calamitous time, in
which the Roman pope exalted his might to the highest, in the occidental
churches, and the Turk his power, in the Orient; where, then, the divine
and pure doctrine became most abominably adulterated in every respect.
Yea, the ground of doctrine, and all external ceremonies, as well as all
points of doctrine,-all these, without reservation, the Pope of Rome
would have under his control; in consequence of which such a blindness
and darkness arose among men, that almost all of them took upon them the
yoke, submitting whatever they spoke or wrote, with more fear to the
judgment of the pope, than of God Himself, or of His church. Rules were
established. by which all controverted articles were
Page301
to be decided and judged; namely, the corrupted writings of the fathers,
and the decrees or resolutions of councils. The Word of God entirely
lost its honor, dignity and credit; yea, it was thenceforth accepted
only as far as the opinion of the fathers and councils allowed.
Moreover, the Word of God was no longer expounded from the Holy
Scriptures, but according to the apprehension of their own imagination,
etc. Besides, too much concession was made to the heathen subtleties of
Aristotle; yea, with such folly, that the obscure writings of this
heathen were introduced into the schools, brought into the pulpit, and
mixed with the articles of faith, etc. Jac.
Mehyn. Bapt. Hist., Q. 717,
from Cent. Magd. X111,
chap. 13.
As regards infant baptism, because the same was much contradicted, yea,
utterly rejected, at this time, by the Waldenses and Albigenses, those
of the Roman church, in order to provide for this, and to maintain it,
ordained various things, called baptism
of necessity (private
baptism), baptism by
women, baptism by heretics.
The Magdeburg Centuriators quote the following (chap.
6, fol. 242) from a
synodal book, written jointly by some bishops, at Nemansa, A. D. 1251,
"We command, that an infant, just born and in peril of death, so that it
can not be brought to the priest, be baptized by the men present,
whether in warm or in cold water, but with no other liquid, and this in
a wooden, stone or other vessel. But if there be no men present, let the
women who are there baptize the child, or even the father or the mother,
in case there be no one else present, to baptize the child." Bapt.
Hist., pp. 727, 728.
By these and similar means the Romanists at this time, sought to
maintain the credit of infant baptism, which was greatly opposed; to
which end tended also the words of Aquinas, which are as follows, "The
proper administrator of baptism shall be a priest, whose province it is
by virtue of 'his office, to baptize; but in cases of necessity, not
only a chaplain, but also a layman, or a woman, yea, even a heathen or a
heretic may baptize, if he only observes the form of the church, and
purposes to do what the church does. But if a person, from necessity, is
baptized by such an one, he indeed receives the sacrament, so that he
need not be baptized again; but he does not receive the grace of
baptism, because he is considered as not having been baptized aright," Thorn.
Aquin. de Art., Fid., chap. 14, in
Bapt. Hist., Q. 725.
In the same direction tends what is adduced in Cent.
Magd., X111., chap. 6, fol. 242,
from the above-mentioned synodal book of the bishops of Nemansa, "But,"
say they,"if a child, in case of necessity, has been baptized by a
layman, according to the form prescribed, we command, that said child,
if it survives, be brought as soon as possible to the priest, who shall
diligently examine how it was baptized; and if he find that the form
prescribed was not observed aright, he shall baptize the child (again),
according to the form of the church. But if he doubt whether it was
rightly baptized, or not, since perhaps the baptizer did not properly
consider the words which he spoke in baptism, or because the bystanders
were not agreed in this, or because there is no certainty whether it was
baptized or not, the priest shall baptize it with these words: 'If thou
art baptized, I baptize thee not again; but if thou art not baptized, I
baptize thee in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy
Ghost.' In such doubtful cases, however, one witness is sufficient when
more can not be had." Bapt.
Hist., p. 728.
Who does not see that the Roman church, when infant baptism was
contradicted, endeavored by these and similar absurdities, to make it
appear to the common people as though infant baptism were absolutely
necessary to salvation, yea, so necessary that rather than neglect it
for want of a priest, even women, yea, heathen and heretics whom they
otherwise were accustomed to burn, might baptize the infants if they
only observed the form of baptism employed by the church. O strange
theology I Merely to maintain the error of infant baptism, many other
errors were maintained.
OF THE TRUE BAPTISM
Nevertheless, in the midst of these storms and billows of antichrist,
God preserved the ark of His church, so that many persons still
remained, who, notwithstanding the manifold troubles and persecutions
that came upon them on this account, practiced and maintained the true
worship of God, particularly in opposition to infant baptism, the office
of criminal authority, the swearing of oaths, and almost all other
superstitions of the Roman church.
A. D. 1206.-In the beginning, yea, before the beginning of this century,
and so through a number of years, the doctrine of the ancient
Anabaptists increased not a little, which appeared more particularly in
the year 1206, when they had so increased in many countries, that the
wiles and power of the Roman church were not sufficient to bring them to
apostatize, much less to exterminate them.
Concerning this, P. J. Twisek gives the following description, "The
adherents of the doctrine of Peter de Bruis and Henry of Toulouse,
Anabaptists, mentioned for the year 1135, which doctrine afterwards was
also followed by the Waldenses (see the year 1159), multiplied so
greatly about this time, namely, A. D. 1206, that few were found in the
provinces of Albi, Languedoc, Narbonne, Gascony, Rouergue, and Toulouse,
who did not adhere to said doctrine, notwithstanding Pope Innocent III
very cruelly opposed it. See account for the year 1198.
The principal points of their doctrine, besides others, were these: 1.
That the Roman church was the whore of Babylon. 2. That her polity was
impure and corrupted. 3. That the mass was
Page 302
a work replete with wickedness, and instituted neither by Christ nor for
His disciples. Chron. Q. 523,
col. 1 and 2,
from Chron. Nicol. Gill.,
fol. 286 Guil.
Merul., fol. 798, Henr.
Boxh., fol. 22.
A. D. 1218.-For this
year mention is made by Sebastian Franck, of the ancient Waldenses, whom
he calls by three different names. The
Poor, Insabbdtati and Waldenses. However,
that they together were but one people, has already been proved. Said
author writes thus concerning them, "These originated A. D. 1218, under
Emperor Louis IV. They are also excommunicated in the bull of the Lord's
Supper, and hold
1."That men ought not to swear at all, not even to the truth.
2."That no judge, who would be a Christian may put to death any one, not
even a malefactor.
3."That the pious person who holds to the faith of the Roman church, can
not be saved.
4."That an ungodly priest can not consecrate.
5."That the church perished at the time of Sylvester.
6."That they are not subject, neither intend to be, to the pope or to
other prelates."
Then follow several other articles of their doctrine, which, for the
sake of brevity, we will pass over; for instance, that they held, "That
outside of their church there was no sacrament nor baptism (which
completely overthrows the infant baptism of the Roman church); that they
denied purgatory; that they counted the mass, alms, and prayers for the
dead of no value, yea, that they regarded them .as the inventions of
priestcraft; that honoring the saints had not the slightest merit, and
that they do not hear our prayers in heaven."
These and similar articles are adduced there, from Aeneas, Sylviusand
other writers, as charges against the Waldenses; of which the
intelligent may judge. Seb.
Fr. Chron. der Rom. Kett., fol. 119,
col. 4, letter P.
A. D. 1230.-It is
stated that the Waldenses, whose good confession we have already shown,
declared at this time in the proceedings which it seems they had against
the pope, that their numbers were so great in Germany, France and Italy,
and especially in Lombardy-where their teachers lived, to whom they
annually sent sustenance from other countries-that any one of them
traveling from his country to Milan, could lodge every night with one of
his own persuasion, whom they recognized by certain marks on the door or
upon the roof. P. 1.
Tzcnsck, Chron., Q. 546,
col. 2, from Henr. Boxh.,
fol. 25.
A. D. 1238.-Or about
1239, the Waldenses had thus increased in France and Flanders, that a
certain Dominican monk, Robert Boulgre, sent as inquisitor by Pope
Gregory IX, put to death a countless multitude of them; of which more
will be said hereafter. P.1. Twisek,
Chron., p. 554, col. 1.
A. D. 1242.-At this
time, said people had to suffer much from popery, on account of their
faith and religion, which in the bishopric of Toulouse alone, appeared
in the case of about two hundred persons, who held said belief, and were
called Waldenses; of whose imprisonment and death we shall speak in the
future. P. I. Tzvisck,
Chron., p. 557, col. 1.
A. D. 1259.-At this
time, or thereabouts, Gerard Sagarellas, an Italian, but a doctor of
Paris, wrote a book against the Franciscans, whereupon Bonaventura,
General of the Franciscan order, replied; however, of this Gerard and
his belief, as also of that of the Waldenses, we shall speak more fully
hereafter. We would only stop to say that from this time on, his
disciples, the Fratricelli, or
Little Brothers, after the year 1285, called Dulcinists, began
secretly (from fear of persecution) to hold their meetings in the
mountains of Piedmont, and Novara, in Lombardy, professing the doctrine
of the Waldenses. However, from the different places where they lived,
they received different names; but the appellation Fratricellior Frerots, was
especially given them, because they called each other brethren
in Christ; nevertheless
the mouths of the scorners thus spoke only the truth, since Christ
Himself so called His disciples, saying, "All ye are brethren" (Matt.
23:8); and"I will declare thy name (O God) unto my brethren; in the
midst of the church will I sing praise unto thee" (Heb. 2:12) .
A. D. 1262.-At this
time the Waldenses are again mentioned, who lived in Lombardy, and in
the country of Genoa, and professed a sound profession, though they were
called heretics by the papists, and were oppressed and persecuted by
open decrees of the Roman see; which shall be spoken of more fully
elsewhere. Compare Bzov.,
A. D. 1262. Art. 3, ex Decret. Epist. Alexand. IV., with A.
Mell., Hist., fol. 470, col. 2.
A. D. 1280.-In this
year it is recorded that said people professing the above profession
(namely, the Waldenses, then called Waldois, after Waldo and his
adherents, were expelled from Lyons), so multiplied in Lombardy that
their doctrine, having spread in Italy, penetrated even into Sicily; as
is attested by the open letters emitted against them by the Emperor
Frederick II.
As regards their faith, the following articles, over and above what has
already been mentioned. respecting their views against infant baptism,
the office of criminal authority, the swearing of oaths, etc., were laid
to their charge, as can be gleaned from the writings of Reinerius, the
priest: That in the matter of salvation we must believe only the holy
Scriptures, and in no wise depend on men. That said Scriptures contain
everything that is necessary to salvation; and that nothing is to be
received but what is commanded of God. That there is but one Mediator
(Christ), and, consequently, that the saints ought not to be invoked.
That there is no purgatory, but that all who are justified in Christ,
enter into life everlasting, and those who do not believe, shall be cast
into eternal death; thus
Page 303
denying that there is still besides a third or fourth place.
They accepted and admitted but two sacraments, namely, holy baptism and
the holy Supper. They said that all masses, particularly those for the
dead, should be rejected; likewise all human institutions, and that they
ought not to be considered necessary to salvation: They also taught that
the chanting, the hours, the fasting connected with certain days,
superfluous feast days, distinction of food, the many degrees and orders
of priests, monks, and nuns, the benedictions and consecrations of
creatures, vows, pilgrimages, in short, the vast medley of ceremonies
which in the times past had been brought into vogue, ought to be
abolished. They denied the supremacy of the pope, especially as
exercised by him over secular government, and admitted no other degrees
in church offices than bishops, teachers (then called priests), and
deacons. They said that the Roman see is the true Babylon, and the pope
the fountain of all misery; that the marriage of the priests (or
teachers) is good, and necessary in the church; that those who hear and
rightly understand the Word of God, are the true church, to which Christ
has given the keys, to let the sheep in, and to drive away the
wolves."Behold here," says the writer,"the sum of the doctrine of the
Waldoes (or Waldenses), which was oppugned by the enemies of truth, and
on account of which they, according to the testimony of their opponents,
were persecuted." P. 7. Turisck,
Chron., p.605, col. 2, and
p. 606, col. 1, from the Staet
der Kerchen, Jan. Cresp., fol. 314,
315, 316. Merul., fol.
843. Henr. Boxh., fol. 19, 25.
A. D. 1284.-At this time the Waldenses, according to Twisck, multiplied
more and more in France and other countries of Christendom, though they
were sought with craftiness and cruelly persecuted, and even previously
every means and all diligence had been employed to utterly extirpate
them; which greatly astonished certain bishops of that time, and also
certain lawyers of Avignon, in certain consultations held against them,
and still extant. P. J.
Twisck, Chron., p. 611,
col. 2.
Concerning the form or mode of baptism, Alexander* (p. 4, q. 11, m. 1),
in this century, says, "Baptism shall be administered in confession of
faith in the Holy Trinity." Jac.
Mehr., Bapt. Hist., p. 726.
Centurid 13, of the Magdeburg
Centuriators, cap. 5, fol.
216, 217, from Cesarius, states"That the Waldenses and Albigenses
rejected baptism at this time, saying that it was inefficacious and
useless; which they, as Jacob Mehrning writes, understood of infant
baptism, which is administered without instruction and faith; for the
Waldenses had a very high regard for the baptism of -Christ, as
administered according to His ordinance." Bapt.
Hist., pp. 733, 734.
* We will say nothing of this Alexander, but merely speak of his
doctrine. NOTE. A. D. 1287.-Probus, Bishop of Tullo, was at this time so
enlightened of God that he not only opposed Pope Honorius IV, but also
delivered an excellent oration, in which he freely exposed the errors of
the papists. Compare Catal.
Test. fol. 654, with the
13th book van den
Ondergang, p. 614, col.
1.
A. D. 1299.-In the year 1299 certain Albigenses and Waldenses, called Fratricelli, or Little
Brothers (of whose faith
and life we have spoken elsewhere), became so odious to Boniface VIII,
Pope of Rome, on account of their uprightness, which the papists called
falseness, that he declared them heretics; but as we intend elsewhere to
speak more fully of their belief and walk among men, we will content
ourselves here with merely mentioning them; it being sufficient for us
that these people and their doctrine existed until the very close of
this century. See in the large Christen
Martelaersboeck, edition
1619, fol. 471, from Trithem.
Chron. Hirsaug.
Proceeding to the close of the century, we will close with the
conclusion of Jacob Mehrning, which is a reply to A. Mellinus, who did
his best to show that the Waldenses did not well accord with the
Anabaptists in the article of baptism. Mehrning replies to him as
follows, "Abraham Mellinus (in his large Nederlandtsch
Martelaers book) dared to
say: 'The Waldenses would not agree with the so-called Anabaptists in
the article of infant baptism.' But the good man forgets that he himself
has adduced testimonies from Bernard, Peter Cluniacensis, and from the
Magdeburg Centuries,* which refute and condemn this supposed error of
the ancient Waldenses, namely, that they should have believed in infant
baptism."Bapt. Hist., p. 736.
AN ACCOUNT OF THOSE WHO SUFFERED IN THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY
SUMMARY OF THE MARTYRS IN THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY
[The way and entrance to the martyrs of this century is through the
valleys of Albi and throughout France, England, and other countries,
where the pious witnesses of Jesus laid down their lives for the
evangelical truth.
From the year 1209 throughout this century, crusades are preached in the
name of the pope; which were the cause of the destruction of thousands
of Albigenses, who lived quietly and peaceably under certain papistic
authorities; for certain reasons, however, we have not finished this
account.
Remarks with eight reasons unanimously indicating the nonresistant
principles of the true Albigenses; nevertheless, for important reasons,
we have placed the account of their martyrdom for the
* The following words are obscure in the author; hence we experienced
difficulty in translating them.-Van. Braght.
Page 304
most part in a marginal note, for the years 1210 and 1211.
One hundred and eighty persons called Albigenses, burnt without the
castle Minerve, A. D. 1210.
Sixty of those people end their lives by fire, for their faith, at
Casser, about A. D. 1211.
About one hundred persons, who confessed the same doctrine, burnt alive
in a tower at Cassas, about the close of A. D. 1211.
Fifty of their fellow believers likewise lose their lives by fire, at
Chastelnau d'Ari, about the close of A. D. 1211.
Over four hundred persons, who professed the same profession, though
called Induti, at Lavaur, or Vaurum, rather suffer themselves to be
burnt to death by the terrible flames than accept the Roman faith.
ACCOUNT PROPER OF THE HOLY MARTYRS
Great persecutions of the believers, A. D. 1206. A man, at London, in
England, burnt alive for the faith of the Waldenses, A. D. 1210; and
twenty-four persons at Paris, in France, likewise put to death by fire,
for the same religion.
In the year 1212, about one hundred persons called Waldenses, are put to
death by fire at Strasburg; thirty-nine at Bingen, and eighteen at
Mentz.
Account of a cruel inquisition, A. D. 1214, over the doctrine of the
Waldenses; Conrad of Marpurg, the chief inquisitor, and his mode of
examination with red-hot iron, as well as with hot and cold water; also,
the oath which the inquisitors in the bishopric of Utrecht were wont to
put to those who were then called heretics, abot A. D. 1215.
About eighty persons called Waldenses, burnt for the faith, at
Strasburg; also some Christians at Toulouse, about A. D. 1215.
Gerard de la Motte, a deacon of the Christians called Albi-Waldenses,
with some of his fellowbelievers, sacrificed by fire, at Borriens, A. D.
1227.
Several papal statutes and ordinances against the Waldenses, related for
the year 1229.
Severe persecution, through the Inquisition, in Germany, where very many
Waldenses are burnt for the faith, A. D. 1230.
Three decrees of Emperor Frederick II are successively described, for
the year 1230; another severe persecution of the Anabaptistic Waldenses,
in Germany, A. D. 1231.
Nineteen persons of the same profession, burnt in the bishopric of
Toulouse, A. D. 1232; also, two hundred and twenty-four in a place near
Toulouse, A. D. 1243; a rigorous inquisition in the aforesaid bishopric,
A. D. 1251, which was carried also into the following year.
Decree of Pope Urban III against the Waldenses and Albigenses in
Lombardy and about Genoa, A. D. 1262; great persecutions, about A. D.
1280, 1283, 1284.
Gerard Sagarellus burnt at Parma, A. D. 1285; Herman, Andrew, and
Guillemette [Wilhelmina], exhumed, A. D. 1299. Conclusion.]
The valleys of Albi, the region around Toulouse, yea, all France,
England, and other kingdoms, furnish us, during this century, many
martyrs, who, though, they, with reference to the severity of their
tortures, according to the flesh, were pitiable and most miserable,
suffered nevertheless with good cheer, yea, with joy, in consideration
of their sure hope and unshaken confidence in the Lord, as being their
shield and exceeding great reward.*
As regards the persecutions that occurred in this century, against the
Waldenses and Albigenses, they by far surpass all other persecutions of
which we read in the preceding centuries; for it seemed now as if the
very furies of hell, so to speak, had broken loose, to destroy all
believers, yea, almost the whole earth.
In the years 1209-12, 1225, 1234, yea, throughout the entire thirteenth
century, crusades, or socalled holy, voluntary preparations of war were
preached, by order of the pope, for the extermination of the Waldenses
and Albigenses, all over the world, but more particularly in the kingdom
of France.
These crusades consisted in great armies of Roman Catholics, who
voluntarily enlisted in this socalled holy warfare; each distinguished
by a white cross on his breast, or one of white cloth sewed on his
garment; on account of which crosses these armies were called Crusades.
But that they might acquit themselves the more courageously and
intrepidly, in exterminating the Albigenses and Waldenses, yea, that
they might suffer none of them to remain alive, but kill them by fire,
sword, gallows, and other means, the pope most solemnly promised to all
who by so doing should meet death, or fall by the weapons of the princes
seeking to protect the Albigenses and Waldenses, full remission of all
their past sins, yea, that they should straightway go to heaven.
This had the effect, that countless multitudes flocked together, as it
were, to the honor of God, and for the extirpation of the so-called
heresies, in order to obtain forgiveness of sins, and thus dying find
salvation; and having, under certain chieftains, been formed into armies
they marched forth and engaged alone in murdering, burning, desolating
and tyrannizing among the Waldenses and Albigenses, sparing not even the
infant in the cradle. It is impossible to relate how great a multitude
of these innocent people perished, and under what severe torments,
simply on account of their true faith.
* Gen. 15:1.
Page 305
REMARKS IN REGARD TO THE DISTINCTION OF THE PEOPLE CALLED ALBIGENSES OR
WALDENSES
I deem it necessary here, to insert a caution, which I desire that it be
borne in mind wherever the Albigenses and Waldenses (who are introduced
as witnesses of our faith) are spoken of, namely, that we here speak
only of such people as, besides the confession of their and our most
holy faith respecting the points necessary to salvation, were opposed to
war, and willingly and patiently, as defenseless sheep of Christ
appointed for the slaughter, entered the path of death through manifold
torments inflicted upon them by the enemies of the faith, to the glory
of God, the edification of their neighbor, and the salvation of their
own souls.
It is true, that in ancient histories mention is made of people who,
though improperly, were called Waldenses or Albigenses, who resisted,
yea slew their enemies; but of such we do not speak here, indeed, all of
whom there is reason so to think, we would positively pass by.*
It must also be observed here, that the princes who had taken the
defenseless Albigenses and Waldenses under their protection, and even
their soldiers, were sometimes (through sheer ignorance) called
Albigenses or Waldenses, simply because they protected them. However, of
these we do not here speak, but only of those who, according to their
confession, lived peaceably and meekly under their protection.
That many of them dwelt, as defenseless sheep, under the government of
such princes, and that on this account war was sometimes waged by their
enemies against these princes, so that one had to suffer with the other,
is evident from the accounts of the ancients; however, we have, to the
utmost of our ability, distinguished them; so that as far as we know,
not one of those whom we have mentioned as martyrs, had any part or lot
with revenge, much less with war.
In addition to this, I will briefly adduce from ancient writers, for the
benefit of the truth-seeking reader, several arguments, showing that the
Waldenses and Albigenses dwelt defenselessly and in all quiet under the
protection of their magistracies; and that in consequence of this, said
magistrates were also called Waldenses and Albigenses, and war waged
against them; who, when they resisted, were the cause that it was said
that the Albigenses or Waldenses had resisted, yea, actually fought.
First Argument.-Abraham Mellinus, from Innocent III, epist. 84, states:
That the pope, through letters, as well as legates, gave orders,
throughout France, to the ecclesiastics as well as the seculars, to
exterminate the Albigenses; however, Raymond, count of Toulouse had
already taken upon him to defend the Albigenses. For this reason Pope
Innocent