ON RELIGIOUS NEWSPAPERS IN THIS COUNTRY AND AMONG THE
BAPTISTS. — DIFFICULTIES AT FIRST. — TOO NUMEROUS AT TIMES. — THEIR SECULAR
CHARACTER. — FIRST SUNDAY SCHOOL. — ON THE RISE AND MANAGEMENT OF OUR
BENEVOLENT INSTITUTIONS. — ON THE DEATH OF CORRESPONDENTS AND FAMILIAR
FRIENDS.
THE Religious Remembrancer was the first paper of this
kind that fell into my hands. It was published in Philadelphia by a Mr.
Scott, a deacon or elder among the Presbyterians. It was commenced on a
moderate-sized sheet, in 1813, and was continued a few years. Complete files
of the paper for four years, bound in two volumes, are among my documents of
this kind.
For a long time after religious papers began to be
issued, the secular journals not unfrequently spoke lightly of them and
their patrons, and represented this new undertaking as a visionary project,
which in their estimation could not succeed. On the one hand, these journals
had nothing to fear on the score of rivalship, nor did the newspapers reply
to them. At this time, I had just published my old Baptist History, and as
the slow and costly methods of communication then in vogue had occasioned me
much inconvenience in collecting my historical information, a religious
press was to me a most inviting project. This cheap and expeditious method
of corresponding appeared just the thing in this business, in this country,
where so little has been done to collate historical documents, and where so
few ancestral records are to be found.
The Boston Recorder, published by Nathaniel
Willis, a deacon among the Congregationalists, was the second religious
newspaper to which I became a subscriber. This work assumed neutral ground,
which it maintained for a time to my satisfaction; but at length, as some
things in it appeared somewhat sectarian, I wrote Mr. Winchell on the
subject, by way of complaint, and he, in reply, informed me, that a project
was on foot for a paper of our own, and soon the old Christian Watchman
made its appearance, and Deacon James Loring for a long time was its
publisher and principal editor. This paper was commenced in 1819. Now I
found myself at home in the newspaper line, and I gave the undertaking a
hearty encouragement, both by promoting its circulation, and also by
contributing to its columns. Of this favorite sheet I have files from its
commencement, although in some cases, they are incomplete.
As other papers of the kind were begun, as far as
practicable, I gave them countenance and support, mostly, however, by
contributions of matter, original and selected; and when I engaged in
earnest in collecting materials for my late work on Baptist history, I made
an effort with a good degree of success to obtain the religious papers of
all sorts of Baptists in the United States, and in the British Provinces;
and, as I preserve all documents of this kind, I have a large stock of them
on hand, which I would be glad freely to dispose of to those who may desire
them for historical purposes, but if they must go the way of all such
publications, with rare exceptions I will leave them to their fate at home.
Miscellaneous Remarks on Religious Newspapers
The secular character which these journals have more and
more assumed was quite disagreeable to me for a long time, but I finally
became reconciled to it as a matter of necessity, as but a few of them could
live without some advertising pay. I concluded it was better to have a
compound motion of a sacro-secular character rather than none at all. While
religious papers have been increasing in their details of worldly affairs,
those on the secular side, as a general thing, have paid an increasing
attention to religious concerns. In my early day but few managers of the
secular press ever referred to serious matters in respectful terms, but now
they have reporters of their own at all ecclesiastical conventions and
assemblies of an important character, and in their reports may be found
early and full accounts of the doings of these bodies. The same may be said
of the passing events pertaining to all churches and parties in the whole of
Christendom.
A ministerial friend of mine having become the owner and
manager of an old temporal concern, I rallied him on the apparent
incongruity of his course in the business. "O," said he, "the secular press
has become about as religious as the religious, and religious papers are
about as secular as the secular."
This sentiment has been very fully verified in the
accounts which are found of the great revival now (1858) in progress through
the land.
After religious papers became somewhat common, and their
beneficial influence began to be widely experienced and acknowledged, in
some cases they were started prematurely and the management of them was
committed to incompetent hands. The credit system also, in a profuse manner,
was the bane of these papers at an early day, so anxious were the publishers
of them to spread them far and wide. But if they had been well paid for
their circulation was generally too limited and their prices were too low
for them to live long, and in the end losses were incurred, often by those
who were ill able to bear them. "We must have a paper for our own region,"
was a prevalent idea with many, and at the solicitation of friends I labored
hard for a number of years in conjunction with others to establish a small
religious journal for our own little State, of a general character, the only
plan which we could expect would succeed. Bat in the end I advised our
people to go for the Christian Watchman, which they would find a
decidedly denominational paper, and considering its size and superior
quality, much cheaper than we could make at home.
As to the size of our religious papers, the form of them
and the method of publishing them, different customs have prevailed, but
generally they have begun small, and those that have lived have gained in
amplitude by degrees, till in a few cases they have become much too largo
for the convenience of the readers and the profit of the publishers. A
Kentucky paper was the most remarkable for its size of any of our
denomination that has come into my hands. This sheet approached the
bed-blanket standard, but ere long it was cut down to a medium size.
The folded form for binding has been sometimes adopted,
but very few of them, I think, are ever bound.
Companies, conventions, and individuals have, at first,
been the owners of our religious papers, but so far as I have observed, they
generally do the best under personal ownership and responsibility. On the
whole, I recommend for these journals the folio form, the medium size, and
as little disputation as possible.
My Experience in the Business of Sunday School
Fifty-four years ago, when I
began my ministry in Pawtucket, being then a licensed preacher, and student
in college, I found a quiet little company of poor factory children, under
the care of the village school master, who had a moderate compensation for
his services from a few factory owners, for the children all were free.
The main object of this juvenile seminary was to impart the rudiments of
common school-education, but from the day on which it was kept, it was
called a Sunday School. This benevolent undertaking was set in motion
seven years before this time by the late Samuel Slater, of cotton mill
notoriety, for the benefit of the poor, ignorant, and neglected children who
had gathered round his mill, then the only one in the place. Pawtucket at
this time was a small village, with but few meeting-going people in it,
without any church or settled minister on the ground. The first Baptist
church was formed in 1805. We had heard of Raikes' enterprise in England, in
the Sunday School line, and his plan was copied by this new American
institution, which still lives on an improved platform in a numerous
pedigree in Pawtucket and vicinity. This sacro-secular concern was moulded
into the shape of modern Sunday Schools about forty years ago. By this time
the little one had become two bands, with two masters, one of whom is now an
aged deacon in a neighboring Baptist church. By degrees Bible reading and a
moderate share of religious instruction had been introduced into our unusual
but very useful establishment, until by mutual agreement the old system was
dispensed with and a new one was adopted. The main body of the school went
to the first Baptist church, then under my care; a large branch of it was
taken up by the Episcopal church, then newly instituted; and as the
Congregational, the Methodist, and other churches arose, their Sunday
Schools had in their composition relics of this old peculiar band, now under
review, some of whom are yet to be found amongst the aged citizens of the
place.
This old first day school, as it was called by its
patrons of the Friendly order, who were among its liberal supporters in its
most enlarged operations, required a good deal of attention from some
quarter; books were to be procured, stationery supplied, incidental expenses
to be defrayed, and the masters to be secured and paid; and as I was the
only minister on the ground, most of this labor for many years came on me at
an early day, and so it continued until about the time of the dissolution of
the old confederacy. As my labors increased I proposed to one of the firmest
friends of the cause either to retire from my post or to have one or more
associated with me.
"Friend B.," said the good old Quaker, "thee does the
thing very well; no new hand could take a hold of it as readily as thee
does. We will supply the money, and if thee does a good deal of work, we
will give thee a good deal of credit for it."
I ought to mention, that serious scruples were
entertained by many of our citizens as to the propriety of common school
keeping on the Sabbath. These scruples operated strongly on my own mind when
I first fell in with the school, and whether to favor or oppose it, was a
serious question. The condition of the factory help was deplorable. They had
been collected from the highways and hedges, and such were the prejudices
against the cotton mills, in early times, that no others could be obtained
for them. By the means of this school, the minds and morals of these
children of misfortune were improved. They were kept from roving and
mischief on the Sabbath, and as Sabbath services increased, they were
induced by degrees to attend them.
I have thus given a brief account of my early connection
with Sunday School operations, under circumstances of a very peculiar kind.
After the transformation of this old concern into modern shape, it soon
became very prosperous, and now, it is doubtful whether many places can be
found, of equal size, which do more in the business of Sunday Schools
notwithstanding the abundance of natives, and the superabundance of
foreigners, in our various manufacturing establishments, who altogether
neglect the ample supply of schools and churches and reforming institutions,
on the ground, which was so uncommonly destitute of every thing of the kind
when the peculiar school now under consideration was commenced. Indeed, at
that period, the age of benevolent operations had scarcely dawned upon any
portion of the world, and not at all on this region.
The claim of Pawtucket, of having started the first
Sunday School in America, for a long time remained undisputed; but of late
years, a number of rival claims of priority in the business have been set
up. Most of these claims, however, are in favor of old catechising
operations, which we do not admit can be fairly brought into competition
with our school.
Pawtucket people are not very sensitive or ambitious in
this matter, and if living witnesses can be produced, of a Sunday School
more than sixty years ago, which still lives in a dozen or more branches,
and the whole history of it is attested by such testimony
as they can show,
they will relinquish their claim.
On the Rise and Management of our Benevolent Institutions.
It has so happened that the getting up of these institutions has always been
in advance of public opinion,
or in other words, a few active and influential men set them
in motion, and then, labor to arouse a public
sentiment in their favor. They do a good deal of special
pleading themselves, and soon a company| of agents is sent out, with special instructions to perform the same
special service. These men traverse the churches in search of funds to sustain the new enterprises, and annually this
course must be pursued. But to begin at the right end, the churches themselves ought to take the lead in all new
undertakings which must be sustained by them, and keep them immediately under their control. If this course had
been originally and strictly pursued, much of the difficulty which we have witnessed in the management
of our benevolent efforts might have been avoided.
In the commencement of our foreign mission cause, which,
was taken hold of more earnestly and generally
by the whole denomination than any which
it has since been engaged in, it
was confidently believed the work would soon be carried on by voluntary contributions of the churches,
and that soliciting agents would not long be needful. But how different
has been the result of this experiment, and how far short
has this most popular cause among our people, for upwards
of forty years, been from being sustained without the aid of the
more and more unpopular system of
special agents. A similar infelicity has attended all our societies for
benevolent objects. And this state of things, in all
probability, must continue until a radical change is effected in the manner
of their support or the amount of
their expenses. The churches must more generally learn to go alone
in their doings for benevolent objects, as
well as for other matters. The number of such as follow this rule, though
small, is probably increasing, and when all
of them have learned how to bring it into practical operation, then the
costly and much complained of agency system
will be superseded. And my theory for a long time has been, that the
going alone policy should be more
assiduously and earnestly urged upon our churches, than it has hitherto
been. At present, the great mass of them wait for
agents to come around, and after their departure, they wait again till
another year. And it is most likely that the
loudest complaints of the bad policy of spending so much on agents come from
churches of the above description,
whose pastors very quietly throw all the labor and responsibility in this
business into the agents' hands, and then
wonder why the support of our benoevolent
institutions should cost so much.
Among the American Bapttist of the regular or associated class, we
find some six or eight societies for different objects, of a
general character, and in none of them have I observed any very
serious troubles in the management of their internal
concerns, except the one which is
devoted to the foreign mission cause; and the difficulties in this body, which have been exceedingly disagreeable to the great
mass of our people, appear to have risen and existed principally between the managers at home and a portion of
the missionaries abroad.
This
institution, formerly called the
Triennial Convention, now the missionary Union, for many years at
first had no missionary rooms;
the labors of its officers were gratuitously performed
; and the few men then in the foreign field, with Judson
at their head, regulated their own affairs pretty
much in their own way. The churches, which gradually arose under their labors, were
settled on our denominational
platform, and were regarded by us in
the same light as if they had been planted on our
own soil. The pastors of these churches also, whether of home or
heathen origin, stood on a
level, in our estimation, as to their
official powers, with Baptist ministers of every land.
Both^ministers and churches
might be advised, but not compelled, in the ordinary operations of their
missions, about which it was presumed they
were better able to judge than their distant patrons. Such was the state
of things in our foreign mission
concerns in its early stages. And in it, as I understand the matter, we
have an exhibition of the primordial and genuine
principles of the Baptists from time immemorial, relative to all that
pertains to their churches and ministers,
under all circumstances, and in all locations. This policy has always
worked well with our people.
Under its
influence there has been but little trouble among us,
in the management of our churches,
associations,
conventions and ecclesiastical and benevolent institutions, of
whatever nature. From this policy, in my judgment, it is both
unwise and unsafe for any of our managing boards and committees to swerve in
any direction. And if by chance they
find an excuse for doing so, in constitutional rules in their platforms,
which have been borrowed from other parties,
whose customs differ from ours, they should ignore them, as spurious
interpolations, and stick to the good old
Baptist doctrine.
The complaints
against our men at our foreign mission rooms, of a departure from Baptist
usages in some of their theories and
enactments, are too well known to need repeating. Amidst all the painful
discussions which have followed, I
have pondered and mourned, and the more
so, as I have never seen the
time, since our eastern mission commenced, when
there was so much encouragement for prosecuting it with renewed
vigor, especially among the Karens,
that numerous, peculiar, and, in some
respects, anomalous race of orientals, among whom our missionaries
have had, and are still having, a success
almost without a parallel in more modern times.
"While many of my brethren have made a free use of
the
pulpit, the press and the platform, in commenting on the disagreements between some of our missionaries
and their opponents, I have carefully avoided them all. I have never fallen
out with our disagreeing men on either side. If I have seen what I
regarded as mistakes among any of them, I have
attributed them more to errors in judgment than to
hurtful designs; and if I have noticed
non-Baptistical ideas in any official
documents, I have traced them to a too
literal construction of rules lately alluded to. And while the parties,
who by their protracted discords have
so essentially retarded the progress of our
oldest and largest institution for the support of missions, have often treated
each other in a somewhat unbrotherly manner, I have nourished a
brotherly feeling for them all. Some
remarks, which in my retirement I
have recorded on this family difficulty for
insertion here, I have
concluded to omit.
And now if I could act for all who may have been implicated in the
discussions and jars above referred
to,
whether at home or in the foreign field, they would at once cease; the hatchet
would be buried in deep oblivion; the
dispersed missionaries would return to their work; and thus a new impulse would be given
to our foreign mission cause. And if our new Baptist interest in the
far East, with its growing strength,
its numerous churches, its increasing
associations and
other institutions peculiar to our
denomination, should exhibit
signs of verging from colonial dependence to independence of action, let
us favor such a manly effort, is my decision; and so far as it is
successful, our churches
will be relieved at home by such an auspicious measure, and will be encouraged to engage
in new enterprises in
other regions. And I look forward
to the time when the great and increasing body of American Baptists,
with their abundant
means, and with the capacity which they have shown that they possess for the
work of evangelization among
heathen nations, shall plant the gospel
standard in the opening fields of China and Japan, in the newly-explored regions of
Africa, and in many other distant
and benighted realms.
On the Death of Correspondents and Familiar Friends.
As this list was considerably extensive, the solemn tidings of their departure
have quite frequently arrived. As my historical pursuits were commenced at
an early age, I became familiarly acquainted then with many who were in middle life, or
else were far advanced in years. This class has long since been gone to their
rest.
When I set out in the ministry, such men as Baldwin, Gano, J. Williams,
Staughton, Rogers, Semple, Furman, Mercer, and men of
their rank, were in the meridian of their strength and activity ; all of them
have long since ceased from their labors.
The same may be said, with a very few exceptions, of a large
company, who were about my equals in age, and were my associates
and coadjutors in the various plans, for general good and for the special
benefit of the Baptists, which
they were either newly devising, or to which they were beginning to pay more
earnest attention.
Among the men of
this second class, I might name Bolles, Sharp, Winchell, Going, Gammell, Davis,
Galusha, Brantley, Peck of
the West, and a long list of others. And very many young men, of unusual
promise, who commenced their
course when mine was nearly run, have in succession, and often unexpectedly,
been called from their various
posts. On many of the men above named or referred to, some of' whom were in
remote regions, and were little known
by the Baptist public at large, I had made much dependence in my historical
pursuits, and how to supply their
places with correspondents, has often occasioned me no little embarrassment
and concern. Although they were, for the
most part, men of humble pretensions, yet they could afford me great assistance
for their own regions, so that I
had a double reason to mourn their loss, and the report of their deaths, has
often been a funeral knell in a twofold
sense.
For a long time past there has been a strangeness in the appearance of the large
gatherings of our people. A new set of men are on
their platforms, and are in their councils; and when I look around for the old
leaders, very few of them are to be seen.
And now, 1859, on the octogenarian list, I seem almost alone, as to the
brotherhood of my early days, and to belong to a bygone age.
Amidst the crowd of a younger race, I often say
with Young,
" I've been so long remembered, I'm forgot.'"
But when these new men recognize the old man, and recount their recollections of
former years, this
feeling is in
some measure
dispelled.
|